Dinamika Persepsi Orang Tua dan Guru Terhadap Penggunaan Gawai dalam Pendidikan Disiplin Anak

Diana Lutfiana Ulfa; Lituh Sinana

doi:10.28926/pej.v6i1.2717

Diana Lutfiana Ulfa Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
Lituh Sinana Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28926/pej.v6i1.2717

Keywords: parents’ perceptions, teachers’ perceptions, digital devices, child discipline, Civic Education

Abstract

This study aims to describe the similarities and differences between parents’ and teachers’ perceptions regarding the use of digital devices in children’s discipline education, as well as to analyze the role of Civic Education (PKn) as a framework for developing disciplined behavior in device use at home and at school. The research was conducted at SDN Mangunan 02, Blitar, using a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The findings indicate diverse perceptions of device use: some parents have provided their children with personal devices, while others restrict access by allowing the use of parents’ devices only. A similar dynamic appears among teachers: the use of devices at school remains limited due to the small number of Chromebooks available to be shared among classes, yet teachers still encourage digital engagement through online assignments. Furthermore, PKn values are shown to be an important framework in fostering discipline, responsibility, and self-control in children’s use of technology. This study highlights that synergy between parents’ and teachers’ perceptions and educational roles is essential to cultivating a healthy digital discipline culture among elementary school students.

References

Adisel, Adisel, and Suryati Suryati. 2021. “Pengembangan Nilai-Nilai Demokratis Mahasiswa Melalui Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.” IJOCE: Indonesia Journal of Civic Education 1(2):69–75. doi:10.31539/ijoce.v1i2.2402.

Andzani, Diva. 2023. “Dinamika Komunikasi Digital: Tren, Tantangan, Dan Prospek Masa Depan.” Jurnal Syntax Admiration 4(11):1964–76.

Bandura, Albert. 1991. “Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2):248–87. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. “The Ecology of Human Development.”

Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan.

Gottfredson, Michael R., and Travis Hirschi. 1990. “A General Theory of Crime.”

Indriani, Rini, and M. Yemmardotillah. 2021. “Literasi Digital Bagi Keluarga Milenial Dalam Mendidik Anak Di Era Digital.” Continuous Education: Journal of Science and Research 2(2):1–13.

Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1971. “1. Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education.” Moral Education 23–92.

Lickona, T. 1992. Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. A Bantam Trade Paperback. Bantam.

Lotto, Linda S. et al. 1986. “Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 8(3):329. doi:10.2307/1163741.

Maulana, Muhammad Zaki. 2025. “Pendidikan Islam Adaptif Di Era Digital: Sinergi AI Generatif Dan Learning Analytics.” Insight: Islamic Education and Learning 1(2):80–88.

Mayer, Richard E. 2009. Multimedia Learning, Second Edition.

Mayer, Richard E. 2014. “Introduction to Multimedia Learning.” The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning 1–24.

Nelsen, Jane. 2023. “Positive Discipline Travels the World.” The Journal of Individual Psychology 79(2):88–104. doi:10.1353/jip.2023.a904853.

Rohman, Khabibur. 2019. “Agresifitas Anak Kecanduan Game Online.” Martabat: Jurnal Perempuan Dan Anak 2(1):155–72. doi:10.21274/martabat.2018.2.1.155-172.

Schwartz, Shalom H. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.